<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Construction Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Let's make it right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Lean Construction by Luiz Junqueira</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/lean-construction/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Luiz Junqueira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Goog post. I&#039;m thinking to use it in my wordpress site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goog post. I&#8217;m thinking to use it in my wordpress site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIM is good, but it&#8217;s not enough by Janne Saarikko</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/bim-is-good-but-its-not-enough/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Janne Saarikko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Sina,

Estimating and scheduling are included in Revit as feature topics, yes.

The question is how useful and ideal that is for professional quantity surveyors and schedulers who want to have item-based actual figures and detailed simulations for materials, resources and scheduling.

(And then also want to provide the information to the site management and backoffice accurately and in time).

Sina, it would be interesting to hear more about your thesis on BIM/QIM.

Why don&#039;t you drop me a line. You can find the contacts through &quot;about&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sina,</p>
<p>Estimating and scheduling are included in Revit as feature topics, yes.</p>
<p>The question is how useful and ideal that is for professional quantity surveyors and schedulers who want to have item-based actual figures and detailed simulations for materials, resources and scheduling.</p>
<p>(And then also want to provide the information to the site management and backoffice accurately and in time).</p>
<p>Sina, it would be interesting to hear more about your thesis on BIM/QIM.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you drop me a line. You can find the contacts through &#8220;about&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIM is good, but it&#8217;s not enough by Sina</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/bim-is-good-but-its-not-enough/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Sina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Revit already does the estimating portion for you and scheduling if im not mistaken.

Exactly what are the lacking features or features that are not working properly in Revit?

I&#039;m going to be doing a masters thesis in BIM (well QIM to be exact), and i can also write software code (good thing they&#039;ve opened up Revit so you can extend its functionality). My background is building construction, so i am fully versed should you like to get technical.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revit already does the estimating portion for you and scheduling if im not mistaken.</p>
<p>Exactly what are the lacking features or features that are not working properly in Revit?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be doing a masters thesis in BIM (well QIM to be exact), and i can also write software code (good thing they&#8217;ve opened up Revit so you can extend its functionality). My background is building construction, so i am fully versed should you like to get technical.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lean Construction by 3D PERSPECTIVES &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digesting Thoughts (Live!) from the European CATIA Forum, Day 1</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/lean-construction/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>3D PERSPECTIVES &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digesting Thoughts (Live!) from the European CATIA Forum, Day 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] If you’d like to dig deeper into lean construction, check out Sir John Egan’s “Rethinking Construction.” It was written in 1998 but remains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you’d like to dig deeper into lean construction, check out Sir John Egan’s “Rethinking Construction.” It was written in 1998 but remains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quantity and Cost Control by Bookmarks about Cost</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/quantityandcostcontrol/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Cost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Quantity and Cost Control  http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/quantityandcostcontrol/ - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by shekhariitm on July 10, 2008  Counting the cost of ICT charity  http://letters.itweek.co.uk/2008/07/counting-the-co.html - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by TakaSohma1 on July 10, 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quantity and Cost Control  <a href="http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/quantityandcostcontrol/" rel="nofollow">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/quantityandcostcontrol/</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 4 members originally found by shekhariitm on July 10, 2008  Counting the cost of ICT charity  <a href="http://letters.itweek.co.uk/2008/07/counting-the-co.html" rel="nofollow">http://letters.itweek.co.uk/2008/07/counting-the-co.html</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 3 members originally found by TakaSohma1 on July 10, 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Architect &#8211; Artist, Designer or Team Player? by The Architect - Artist, Designer or Team Player?</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/the-architect-artist-designer-or-team-player/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>The Architect - Artist, Designer or Team Player?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] The Architect - Artist, Designer or Team Player? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Architect &#8211; Artist, Designer or Team Player? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIM is good, but it&#8217;s not enough by Janne Saarikko</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/bim-is-good-but-its-not-enough/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Janne Saarikko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-18</guid>
		<description>advanirajesh,

I agree with you, completely.

I just wanted to make this &quot;pictures&quot; provoking simplification because with BIM is considered by many as the ultimate solution to all construction information management problems.

As far as I can see BIM always requires a graphical presentation.  Accounting and procurement people are not most effective digging tendering information from a BIM model. They rather have a dull but functional list refined for their purposes.

This is a never-ending discussion, which should continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>advanirajesh,</p>
<p>I agree with you, completely.</p>
<p>I just wanted to make this &#8220;pictures&#8221; provoking simplification because with BIM is considered by many as the ultimate solution to all construction information management problems.</p>
<p>As far as I can see BIM always requires a graphical presentation.  Accounting and procurement people are not most effective digging tendering information from a BIM model. They rather have a dull but functional list refined for their purposes.</p>
<p>This is a never-ending discussion, which should continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIM is good, but it&#8217;s not enough by advanirajesh</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/bim-is-good-but-its-not-enough/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>advanirajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&quot;BIM for pictures, QIM for Numbers&quot;. I agree that BIM is not enough, but disagree with &quot;BIM for pictures&quot;, if that was the case our previous technologies were good enough. I understand, BIM is very capable of generating metadata (non-picture) also. Although, BIMs today &#039;may not be&#039; experts at it, it relies on QIM for perfection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BIM for pictures, QIM for Numbers&#8221;. I agree that BIM is not enough, but disagree with &#8220;BIM for pictures&#8221;, if that was the case our previous technologies were good enough. I understand, BIM is very capable of generating metadata (non-picture) also. Although, BIMs today &#8216;may not be&#8217; experts at it, it relies on QIM for perfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Construction waste management by John Turner</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/construction-waste-management/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>John Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-12</guid>
		<description>One thing that strikes me in this wonderful world of sustainability and waste reduction is the fact that one of the biggest issues that we are having to deal with is not the fact that people and companies aren&#039;t recycling but; the companies that take the waste can&#039;t cope.

Timber the one commodity if you like that all of us would have thought would be the least of our worries is being sent to landfill because the current system cannot cope with the quantity thrown at it.

In construction there is a vast amount of timber being used and needing to be recycled. Take timber road profiles, mile after mile of them along our new roads delineating line and level, after two uses the timber splits and is no use and so is thrown in a skip. The Cross-Bone I discovered, which has been around for a while is made from recycled plastic and is a 100% reusable profiling system - but know one is using them -are they mad it saves money in all directions -materials, disposal, labour etc.

When will the site management open their eyes to what is available to them and stop being so stuck in their ways - they can&#039;t afford to as the world and environment around them is changing - for the better!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that strikes me in this wonderful world of sustainability and waste reduction is the fact that one of the biggest issues that we are having to deal with is not the fact that people and companies aren&#8217;t recycling but; the companies that take the waste can&#8217;t cope.</p>
<p>Timber the one commodity if you like that all of us would have thought would be the least of our worries is being sent to landfill because the current system cannot cope with the quantity thrown at it.</p>
<p>In construction there is a vast amount of timber being used and needing to be recycled. Take timber road profiles, mile after mile of them along our new roads delineating line and level, after two uses the timber splits and is no use and so is thrown in a skip. The Cross-Bone I discovered, which has been around for a while is made from recycled plastic and is a 100% reusable profiling system &#8211; but know one is using them -are they mad it saves money in all directions -materials, disposal, labour etc.</p>
<p>When will the site management open their eyes to what is available to them and stop being so stuck in their ways &#8211; they can&#8217;t afford to as the world and environment around them is changing &#8211; for the better!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s ban the use of files! by Let’s ban the use of files!</title>
		<link>http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/lets-ban-the-use-of-files/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s ban the use of files!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructiondata.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&acirc;s ban the use of files! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
